Clinical Case Study

How an IEE Revealed a Missed Learning Disability in a Los Angeles Student

Analyzing how a comprehensive Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) diagnosed severe dysgraphia and dyscalculia after standard LAUSD triennial testing determined the student was ineligible for services.

Student Profile
8 Years Old | 3rd Grade
Evaluation Focus
Independent Psychoeducational IEE
District Dispute
District found student ineligible under Specific Learning Disability
IEP Resolution
Qualified under SLD + 180 Min/W specialized academic support

1. Background & Educational Context

The student, an 8-year-old third-grade girl attending a public elementary school within Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), had struggled academically since the middle of first grade. Referred to as Sofia for confidentiality, she was falling significantly behind her peers in written expression and mathematical calculations. Despite her obvious intelligence and expressive language skills, her written work was nearly illegible, with letters of inconsistent sizing, spelling errors that did not follow phonological rules, and frequent letter reversals.

In addition to her writing struggles, Sofia experienced severe anxiety during math lessons. She relied on finger-counting for simple addition and subtraction facts, consistently confused operational symbols (like "+" and "-"), and was unable to grasp the concept of place value. As third grade progressed, Sofia's frustration turned into severe school avoidance. She would complain of physical symptoms like stomach aches and headaches every morning, cry before entering the school building, and shut down during independent academic tasks in the classroom.

2. The District Dispute & Eligibility Barriers

Concerned by her lack of academic progress and high anxiety levels, Sofia's parents requested a comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation from the school district to determine IEP eligibility. The district's psychologist administered a standard cognitive and academic battery. The school psychologist noted that Sofia's cognitive scores fell within the Average range, but concluded that she did not qualify for an IEP under the eligibility category of a Specific Learning Disability (SLD). The district argued that Sofia's academic gaps were due to "instructional deficits" resulting from classroom disruptions, or "emotional overlay," suggesting that her primary problem was anxiety rather than a neurodevelopmental learning disorder.

Sofia's parents felt this assessment missed the underlying cause of her struggles. They argued that her anxiety was a *result* of her undiagnosed learning barriers, not the cause. The parents formally disagreed with the school district's evaluation and requested an Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) at public expense. The school district agreed to fund the IEE, and the family selected CAS Evaluations to conduct the independent assessment.

3. CAS Comprehensive Independent Psychoeducational Evaluation

The CAS Licensed Educational Psychologist (LEP) designed a comprehensive testing battery specifically structured to analyze Sofia's cognitive processing systems and fine motor output. The evaluator administered the **Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V)**, the **Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (WJ-IV)**, the **Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing, Second Edition (CTOPP-2)**, and the **Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (Beery VMI)**.

Unlike the district's broad-stroke assessment, the CAS evaluator dug deep into subtests that isolate specific processing bottlenecks. For written language, the evaluator analyzed spelling, sentence writing, and physical motor manipulation. For math, the evaluator separated arithmetic calculation from conceptual reasoning. The evaluation uncovered a profound processing gap: Sofia had strong verbal reasoning abilities (Verbal Comprehension Index of 108), but severe deficits in working memory (index score of 79) and visual-motor integration (standard score of 71).

4. Standardized Testing & Score Comparison

The standardized testing data highlighted the discrepancy between Sofia's average cognitive potential and her severely depressed academic processing scores, proving the presence of dysgraphia and dyscalculia:

Assessment Area Standardized Test Administered District Score (Percentile) CAS IEE Score (Percentile)
Written Expression WJ-IV Written Language Subtests 85 (16th percentile) 72 (3rd percentile)
Math Calculation WJ-IV Math Calculation Subtest 83 (13th percentile) 75 (5th percentile)
Visual-Motor Integration Beery VMI (Visual-Motor) Not Administered 71 (3rd percentile)
Working Memory WISC-V Working Memory Index 91 (27th percentile) 79 (8th percentile)

The CAS assessment proved that Sofia met the California Education Code criteria for a Specific Learning Disability (SLD). Her deficits in visual-motor integration (which caused physical writing fatigue and dysgraphia) and her working memory deficits (which led to an inability to retain mathematical facts, causing dyscalculia) were directly impacting her ability to access the general education curriculum.

5. Recommended IEP Modifications & Accommodations

The CAS evaluator presented a detailed clinical report recommending that Sofia be qualified for an IEP under the SLD category, with the following accommodations and support services:

  • Specialized Academic Instruction: 180 minutes per week of Specialized Academic Instruction (SAI) in a small group resource setting, focusing on structured, multi-sensory math strategies and phonological spelling interventions.
  • Dysgraphia Accommodations: Access to speech-to-text software for written essays, the use of graphic organizers, and a scribe or typing option for all assessments exceeding one paragraph.
  • Dyscalculia Accommodations: Access to a math reference sheet (visual addition/subtraction charts), place value blocks, and a calculator for all multi-step math problems.
  • Anxiety Supports: A pre-arranged cool-down pass to visit the counselor, extended time (1.5x) on all tests to reduce stress, and sensory breaks during long testing sessions.

6. The Outcome & Long-Term Progress

At the reconvened IEP meeting, the LAUSD team reviewed the CAS Evaluations independent report. Confronted with the rigorous cognitive-academic discrepancy data and the specific processing scores, the district conceded and qualified Sofia for an IEP under Specific Learning Disability (SLD). They adopted all the recommended accommodations and the 180 minutes per week of specialized resource instruction.

Within six months of starting her IEP, Sofia made remarkable progress. Using speech-to-text, she was able to express her ideas without the physical fatigue of handwriting. Her math resource teacher utilized visual place-value blocks that bypassed her working memory deficits, helping her master double-digit subtraction. Most importantly, Sofia's morning school anxiety vanished. She no longer complained of stomach aches and looked forward to going to school, feeling supported rather than overwhelmed.

"We spent two years trying to convince the district that Sofia wasn't just 'lazy' or 'anxious'β€”she was struggling to write and calculate. CAS Evaluations gave us the exact data we needed to hold the district accountable. Once she got her accommodations and specialized help, she became a happy, confident student again."
β€” Michael S., Father of Sofia (8 Years Old)

Why Families Trust CAS Evaluations

We provide independent, forensic-level assessments free from school district constraints.

Licensed Educational Psychologists

State-licensed practitioners conducting objective evaluations.

25+ Years Experience

Decades of experience navigating California special education law.

Independent & Unbiased

Our loyalty is to the data and your child, not district budgets.

IEP Meeting Representation

We attend IEP meetings to ensure our recommendations are heard.

Donald Ghrist, LEP #2703

Written, Reviewed & Fact-Checked by Donald Ghrist

Licensed Educational Psychologist, LEP #2703

Donald Ghrist is the Clinical Director of CAS Evaluations. Holding License #2703 from the California Board of Behavioral Sciences, Donald has spent over 25 years conducting psychoeducational assessments and testifying as an expert witness in California special education due process cases.

Medically Reviewed Legally Compliant (IDEA & CA Ed Code)

Need an Independent Assessment for Your Child?

Speak with an experienced specialist to discuss your child's case and secure a legally defensible educational evaluation.

Request a Free Consultation

Serving Families Across California

CAS Evaluations provides Independent Educational Evaluations at public expense in school districts throughout all 58 counties in California, including:

  • Los Angeles County
  • Orange County
  • San Diego County
  • Kern County
  • San Bernardino County
  • Fresno County